[ros-dev] Re: [ros-foundation] ReactOS Foundation 501c3 Status -
steven_ed4153 at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 7 14:27:17 CEST 2005
--- Royce Mitchell III <royce3 at ev1.net> wrote:
> I think it's important to draw a clear line as to the responsibilities
> of the board as opposed to things that should be decided by all
> commiters ( vs things that the community at large should be invited into ).
I agree. As far as I see it the board should just control the books and thats about it.
> Basically there would be two types of bounties:
> 1) "Directed" bounties: If someone donates money towards the completion
> of a purpose, the money must be made available for that purpose.
> 2) "General Funds" bounties: These are bounties created from the budget
> above. The way I propose this should work is as follows: Anyone with
> commit access can "propose" a bounty. The board would be responsible for
> reviewing the bounty, and if it looks good to them ( possibly amending
> it some ), they would submit it to the body of commiters for approval.
> Obviously the board would be responsible for reigning in the bounties
> from going over budget.
Thats roughly the idea though you have put it in to much better words then I could have.
> I would like to be involved in the by-law development process, or at
> least be able to review them and give some feedback. I would be willing
> to serve on the board, if I'm wanted.
Join the foundation list and we can move forward with a real plan this time.
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates.
More information about the Ros-dev