[ros-dev] KeBugCheck

[Alex Ionescu]

James Tabor wrote:

> WOOOO!
> Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
>
>> Mike Nordell wrote:
>>
>>> Hartmut Birr wrote:
>>>
>>>  
>>>
>>> If not, it's simply impossible to get correct and intended 
>>> functionality,
>>> should preemtion occur.
>>>  
>>>
>> I very much doubt the irql should change at all...
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Thomas
>
>
> It did not click in my pee brain, "Preemption"? How could it preempt 
> inside
> kernel space? I thought atm that was imposable.

Yeah, we don't really preempt on UP as far as I know with the current 
scheduler. I think this only happens on MP, and I agree that the IRQL 
probably doesn't get restored properly. Hopefully it'll work fine in my 
scheduler...I had a similar problem but I found the bug and fixed it.

Best regards,
Alex Ionescu