[ros-dev] Google Integration was: My attitude
Rick Langschultz
rlangschultz at cox.net
Thu Dec 8 19:20:00 CET 2005
I agree. Google employees can spend 20% of their time on a special
programming project; I wonder if any of them would choose ReactOS.
On Dec 8, 2005, at 7:02 AM, Jerry wrote:
> I think Google would be a great partner with ReactOS. We may just
> what to ask them to sponser it.
>
> Rick Langschultz wrote:
>
>> I think integration with Google using C APIs would be preferable.
>> Google would be doing reactos a really great deal if the desktop
>> search engine was opened up and given to the project. Even if by
>> binary only distribution files. Since gds works on windows 2k and
>> up it should be a great addition to the project. Or perhaps
>> addition of an indexing engine to search for files and folders
>> and index them when the system is idol.
>> On Dec 7, 2005, at 2:56 PM, Mark de Wit wrote:
>>
>>> Don't forget about forward looking companies like Google. Even
>>> though they have denied their interest in a GoogleOS, I could
>>> well imagine reactos being of interest to them.
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Hinz"
>>> <post.center at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> I think it's better, if somebody like our PC asks such
>>>> companies, if they want to support this project.
>>>>
>>>> Greets,
>>>>
>>>> David Hinz
>>>>
>>>> Casper Hornstrup schrieb:
>>>>
>>>>> Please do ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>> From: ros-dev-bounces at reactos.org [mailto:ros-dev-
>>>>>> bounces at reactos.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Hunter
>>>>>> Sent: 7. december 2005 04:40
>>>>>> To: ReactOS Development List
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ros-dev] My attitude
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Casper Hornstrup wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dell needs to partner with a solid company which can support
>>>>>>> whatever OS they put on their boxes. If there isn't one, then
>>>>>>> they can't afford putting ReactOS on their boxes. OS licenses
>>>>>>> are cheap. People and knowledge is expensive.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't see the problem with simply asking. Why not ask, let
>>>>>> *them* do
>>>>>> the thinking that we're doing on this list, and let *them*
>>>>>> give us a
>>>>>> definitive answer? If they say, "Thanks, but no thanks,"
>>>>>> then it's no
>>>>>> skin off our collective noses. If they say yes, so much the
>>>>>> better.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kevin
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>> <crashfourit.vcf>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list