[ros-dev] White Paper outdated ?

[Jerry]

I would have to agree with David here. Windows XP should be the target 
for compatibility.

David Hinz wrote:

> TwoTailedFox schrieb:
> > Psychologically, "Windows 2000 Compatible" sounds a lot better than
> > "Windows NT 4.0 Compatible"
>
> The thing is, most people don't even know, that Windows XP is actually 
> Windows NT 5.1 (or Windows 2000 ist Windows NT 5.0).
> So it really makes sense to at least say "Windows 2000 compatible", as 
> _most_ people don't know, that it makes nearly no difference (from the 
> developers point of view) what the development target is, as it is 
> nearly the same.
>
> So maybe the development target should be set to Windows XP, as there 
> are quite a lot people, not even knowing about Windows XP being the 
> successor of Windows 2000.
>
> Greets,
>
> David Hinz
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>


-- 
Listen to Americas Debate Radio at 9 o'clock eastren on Wensdays! 
http://radio.americasdebate.net/listen/low (Dial Up)
http://radio.americasdebate.net/listen/    (BroadBand)

Call in at:
1-888-DEBATE-5
1-912-342-2345
Skype: callto://americasdebate