aleksey at reactos.org
Mon Sep 24 13:51:17 CEST 2007
Please stop rumouring this topic. I clearly said "if there are strong
circumstances, in future, only then we will think about doing 3rd
party audit, and only from agreement of all devs". That's 3 or 4
years away from now, if such legal problems ever happen.
Also noone ever said SFLC is taking up copyrights to themselves. At
least it's first time I hear this.
I just grepped Wine source code base for word "SFLC" - doesn't appear
anywhere. Also, open up any of Wine's source code file, you'll see
"Copyright 200x Person's Name".
And again, I didn't suggest SFLC or FSF or whoever. Time will show
who and if we need, and who and if agrees to.
On Sep 24, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Magnus Olsen wrote:
> It seam u fall into he SFLC traps they are trying push doing the
> audlt of
> ros from a 3 part project
> of ros, and we shall obay theirs rules it mean all api that is not
> in msdn shall be remove
> and so on. That mean 80% of ntoskrnl will go away, for around 80% of
> ntoskrnl are not in msdn
> 80% of win32k will go aways, for thuse api are not in msdn, then
> shall we
> not talk about audio
> no audio system and so on.
> that mean no ros, if we play after SLFC and we need also write
> papper give
> up our copyright to
> them. no thanks
More information about the Ros-dev