[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented
Andrew Faulds
ajfweb at googlemail.com
Thu Apr 15 11:11:06 CEST 2010
You mean we're supporting an interface no-one needs before the biggest gap
in ReactOS I/O support?
2010/4/15 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elhoir at gmail.com>
> ReactOS has PCMCIA support before USB
> lol :)
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey at reactos.org>wrote:
>
>> I fully agree with Ged. I know it's fun to create something from scratch
>> (I used and will still do, of course) and work in an explored area, however
>> I think there should be some control. If you really want to work on that and
>> nothing else - we have rosapps/drivers. In my opinion, trunk has no place
>> for non-working drivers which aren't really a top priority (at least, I
>> didn't include fastfat_new to the build process so noone wastes time
>> compiling a driver which is needed only by 2 or 3 developers).
>>
>> WBR,
>> Aleksey.
>>
>>
>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Ged Murphy wrote:
>>
>> I don't mean to sound like a broken record, and I also understand that
>>> the project allows people to work on whatever they want to. But with the
>>> project in such a state at the moment, is a pcmcia bus driver really the
>>> best thing to be working on?
>>> I'm all for project freedom, but you would hope people to have the
>>> diligence to work on areas which might help to stop the project from
>>> failing.
>>>
>>> Maybe I just don't get it anymore and I'm behind the times, but what
>>> happened to the days when people used to work on important things?
>>>
>>>
>>> Your nagging ex-dev,
>>> Ged.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: ros-diffs-bounces at reactos.org [mailto:
>>> ros-diffs-bounces at reactos.org] On Behalf Of cgutman at svn.reactos.org
>>> Sent: 15 April 2010 02:59
>>> To: ros-diffs at reactos.org
>>> Subject: [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed
>>> PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely
>>> unimplemented
>>>
>>> Author: cgutman
>>> Date: Thu Apr 15 03:59:15 2010
>>> New Revision: 46876
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=46876&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> [PCMCIA]
>>> - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver
>>> - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented
>>>
>>> Added:
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/fdo.c (with props)
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.c (with props)
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.h (with props)
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rbuild (with props)
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rc (with props)
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pdo.c (with props)
>>> Modified:
>>> trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/directory.rbuild
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
--
Andrew Faulds (andrewros)
http://ajf.me/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20100415/21d0c204/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Ros-dev
mailing list