[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely unimplemented

Thu Apr 15 11:37:52 CEST 2010

well, it will be useful whenever it has to :)
so, i dont see it as a bad commit after all, just funny :P

On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:28 AM, Andrew Faulds <ajfweb at googlemail.com>wrote:

> Yes, but we get "donations" on all sorts of unnecessary things.
> We really need "donations" in *useful areas* like, say, USB.
>
>
> On 15 April 2010 10:25, Peter Millerchip <peter.millerchip at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> To be fair:
>>
>> 1. The guy donated his code to ReactOS. Think of it like a gift to us
>> - it might not be what we really wanted, but it's still rude to insult
>> a gift.
>>
>> 2. This isn't "support" for PCMCIA, it's a stub - he said so himself.
>> ReactOS does not support PCMCIA yet.
>>
>> 3. Windows supported PCMCIA before USB, and we are just copying
>> Windows after all! :)
>>
>> On 15 April 2010 10:11, Andrew Faulds <ajfweb at googlemail.com> wrote:
>> > You mean we're supporting an interface no-one needs before the biggest
>> gap
>> > in ReactOS I/O support?
>> >
>> > 2010/4/15 Javier Agustìn Fernàndez Arroyo <elhoir at gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >> ReactOS has PCMCIA support before USB
>> >> lol :)
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey at reactos.org>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I fully agree with Ged. I know it's fun to create something from
>> scratch
>> >>> (I used and will still do, of course) and work in an explored area,
>> however
>> >>> I think there should be some control. If you really want to work on
>> that and
>> >>> nothing else - we have rosapps/drivers. In my opinion, trunk has no
>> place
>> >>> for non-working drivers which aren't really a top priority (at least,
>> I
>> >>> didn't include fastfat_new to the build process so noone wastes time
>> >>> compiling a driver which is needed only by 2 or 3 developers).
>> >>>
>> >>> WBR,
>> >>> Aleksey.
>> >>>
>> >>> On Apr 15, 2010, at 11:05 AM, Ged Murphy wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> I don't mean to sound like a broken record, and I also understand
>> that
>> >>>> the project allows people to work on whatever they want to. But with
>> the
>> >>>> project in such a state at the moment, is a pcmcia bus driver really
>> the
>> >>>> best thing to be working on?
>> >>>> I'm all for project freedom, but you would hope people to have the
>> >>>> diligence to work on areas which might help to stop the project from
>> >>>> failing.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Maybe I just don't get it anymore and I'm behind the times, but what
>> >>>> happened to the days when people used to work on important things?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Your nagging ex-dev,
>> >>>> Ged.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> -----Original Message-----
>> >>>> From: ros-diffs-bounces at reactos.org
>> >>>> [mailto:ros-diffs-bounces at reactos.org] On Behalf Of
>> cgutman at svn.reactos.org
>> >>>> Sent: 15 April 2010 02:59
>> >>>> To: ros-diffs at reactos.org
>> >>>> Subject: [ros-diffs] [cgutman] 46876: [PCMCIA] - Add a mostly stubbed
>> >>>> PCMCIA driver - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are
>> completely
>> >>>> unimplemented
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Author: cgutman
>> >>>> Date: Thu Apr 15 03:59:15 2010
>> >>>> New Revision: 46876
>> >>>>
>> >>>> URL: http://svn.reactos.org/svn/reactos?rev=46876&view=rev
>> >>>> Log:
>> >>>> [PCMCIA]
>> >>>> - Add a mostly stubbed PCMCIA driver
>> >>>> - pcmcia.c is complete but fdo.c and pdo.c are completely
>> unimplemented
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Added:
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/fdo.c   (with props)
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.c   (with props)
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.h   (with props)
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rbuild   (with props)
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pcmcia.rc   (with props)
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/pcmcia/pdo.c   (with props)
>> >>>> Modified:
>> >>>>    trunk/reactos/drivers/bus/directory.rbuild
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> >>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> >>>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> >>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> >>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Ros-dev mailing list
>> >> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> >> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Andrew Faulds (andrewros)
>> > http://ajf.me/
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ros-dev mailing list
>> > Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Andrew Faulds (andrewros)
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20100415/3bbcfc69/attachment.htm>