[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [akhaldi] 48236: Create a branch forcmake bringup.

Adam Kachwalla geekdundee at gmail.com
Fri Jul 30 11:05:10 UTC 2010


I might be a bit of a n00b but at this stage, I also support this  
restructuring of the tree. I also see a potential for optimizing builds to  
allow for building a set of components, as opposed to having to work out  
what components go with what and build them all individually.

Might also help as there are loads of branches in the repository, many   
that haven't been updated in years, that can be easily reduced in size  
and/or merged as a result of the scheme.

That's just my thoughts on it, but I'm not really had more than about 3-4+  
months experience with the ReactOS codebase.

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 04:46:07 +1000, Ged Murphy <gedmurphy at gmail.com> wrote:

> The logical layout is exactly what is wrong with the tree. The tree is  
> currently laid out in a manner which you would expect someone who  
> >doesn't understand NT architecture. Things are laid out by type instead  
> of by architecture.
> It makes building individual areas of the operating system very  
> difficult.
>
> On 25 July 2010 19:03, Aleksey Bragin <aleksey at reactos.org> wrote:
>> Yes, there is no sense in doing two mainly unrelated very big tasks  
>> simulteneously. Also my own opinion still hasn't changed - existing  
>> >>layout is quite logical (there are exceptions, but they are  
>> everywhere), and any modularization could be achieved already with  
>> existing >>tools like sysgen.
>>Let cmake branch be actual cmake experiment, not an awesome attempt to  
>> fix whole ReactOS at onceWBR,
>> Aleksey Bragin.
>>
>> From: Zachary GordenSent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 9:45 PM
>> To: ReactOS Development ListSubject: Re: [ros-dev] [ros-diffs]  
>> [akhaldi] 48236: Create a branch forcmake bringup.
>>
>> I also support a reshuffling of the directories, but not in the cmake  
>> branch.  Let that be used JUST for getting cmake up and running and  
>> >>if/once that is merged into trunk, then we look into changing the  
>> structure.  Best not to complicate one task by adding more to it.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>



-- 
Give a man a fish and he will eat for a day.
Teach a man to fish and he will eat for a lifetime.
Give a man religion and he will die praying for a fish.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20100730/7578790d/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 257 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.reactos.org/pipermail/ros-dev/attachments/20100730/7578790d/attachment.gif>


More information about the Ros-dev mailing list