[ros-general] unacceptable behavior in the forums--we may needaforum moderator

[rené Tournois <betov@free.fr> at postfix4-2.free.fr]

Might be the low quality of my english vocabulary, but i do not know
what difference you are doing between "censoring" and "moderating"...

About "opinions", i think i have been a very good example that this
is _not_ possible.


Betov.


At 09:59 23/02/2004 +0100, you wrote:
>any official message board MUST be moderated.
>Censorship is bad, as long as its the opinions you censor, if its the language 
>its fine. People should be allowed to have their opinion, but they must 
>express it in a civil manner.
>
>So i wote for moderation.
>
>Sincerly
>Tobias Ussing
>
>On Monday 23 February 2004 09:59, rené Tournois 

>> 
>>[...]
>>
>> Though on my own RosAsm Board, i am in favour of a "zero sensorship" rule,
>> for a Board like ReactOS one, keeping completely free from war threads is
>> a must. There is no limit to what the Anti-Gpl guys are able to do.
>>
>> Also, forcing to registration would be much more frustrating, IMHO, than
>> deleting offending and WW3 threads.
>>
>>
>> Betov.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> ros-general mailing list
>> ros-general at reactos.com
>> http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
>
>_______________________________________________
>ros-general mailing list
>ros-general at reactos.com
>http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
>
>