Issue 2. [Re: [ros-general] ROS-User-Issues]

jwalsh at bigpond.net.au jwalsh at bigpond.net.au
Wed Oct 26 03:48:34 CEST 2005


Thanks Lyrical
Not bad for a demented old timer though, just one mistake?
I think this ros-general list  is good for me.
I can't have only got that much wrong, I guessed most of it?
The point I am trying to make is this: Gossip is great but it doesn't cut in court.
Rule of Evidence and Rules the the Court are all a Judge rules on.
The Judge in on our Case is  the ordinary person in the street.
Statements like ReactOS is still an Alpha release is not necessary.
Microsoft has made the eternal Alpha release it's fortune.
Now Red Hat has too, and most other Linux releases.
Copy Cat Industrialised production cannot be trusted.
I get mixed messages from ReactOS Users.
Is this an issue worth pursuing?

Cheers and rosuccess

Justin

---- Lyrical Nanoha <LyricalNanoha at dosius.net> wrote: 
> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, jwalsh at bigpond.net.au wrote:
> 
> > Jobs takes his payout after being dumped from Apple, takes the bit he missed from Xerox Smalltalk80 and builds NeXT computers, the ferrari of Computers.
> > He brings it back to Apple again put it on a Linux kernel and calles it NextStep.
> > Together (AIM group Apple, IBM and Motorolla) they build the "G" series.
> > Microsofts decides to catch up by applying it to his own hardware base i.e.  Intel.
> > It is called the Wintel group.
> 
> NeXT was always based on BSD - OSX still is based on BSD, not Linux.
> 
> -uso.
> _______________________________________________
> ros-general mailing list
> ros-general at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general



More information about the ros-general mailing list