[ros-kernel] Re: ReactOS GPL vs. proprietary drivers - NTFSDriverunder Linux + WINE

[Valentin]

Hi Jan

ReactOS doesn't   aim to be  a copy of  clumsy MS NT (It means only
compatibility)
Why do you think that original MS Ntfs .sys is the best?
We have to create own Ntfs source to enable in  future  the performance
improvement
and related development.

Regards,
Valentin.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jan Kratochvil" <rcpt-ros-kernel.AT.reactos.com at jankratochvil.net>
To: "ReactOS Kernel List" <ros-kernel at reactos.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2003 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [ros-kernel] Re: ReactOS GPL vs. proprietary drivers -
NTFSDriverunder Linux + WINE


> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2003 10:55:54 +0200, Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> ...
> > You need to rewrite the cache manager then, which may not be fun.
>
> BTW you will have to do it anyway. Writing it was just a piece of cake.
> The nightmare was its behavior analysis which is now already done.
>
>
> > Jan did this using glib which may not be an option for ReactOS.
>
> As glib2 already runs on many platforms, you could port it to ReactOS
ntoskrnl
> environment, *grin*. But Cc implementation is really just one evening
hack.
> BTW Captive also implements Cc in Perl (src/TraceFS/checktrace.pl)
> for the purposes of Cache Manager behavior analysis.
>
>
>
> Lace
>
> --
> Jan Kratochvil; http://www.jankratochvil.net/
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-kernel mailing list
> Ros-kernel at reactos.com
> http://reactos.geldorp.nl:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-kernel
>