[ros-kernel] Subversion

[Jason Filby]

Hi Steven

We'll also be moving to a system where checkins are tested not to
break 
the build by compile errors or regressions (by whatever regression
tests 
we have). So I don't think this change will be overnight. Subversion 
will probably have a 1.1 out by the time we're confident enough to 
change over (and all docs will have to be updated first as well).

Cheers
Jason

Steven Edwards wrote:

>Hi Jason,
>
>
>
>I dont think it invalidates the other improvements, just that it
might
>
>be more trouble than it is worth at this point. I do like it better
>
>than CVS from what little I have played with it. I am just thinking
>
>about the ammount of work in moving and changing documentation and
>
>tools for svn might not make it that much better. If we move to it I
>
>wont object though. =)
>
>
>
>As for merging/branching I dont have any hard examples of where it
>
>might be worse other than dicussions I have had with subversion
>
>developers on #svn. Give it a shot, I have not had a lot of time to
>
>play with it.
>
>
>
>  
>
>>Why does one feature that is not any better than CVS invalidate
other
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>features that are? Better merging/branching are to be looked at for
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>the next release anyway. What are the examples were it is worse at
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>merging/branching?
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>Thanks
>
>Steven
>
>
>
>
>
>__________________________________
>
>Do you Yahoo!?
>
>Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
>
>http://search.yahoo.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Ros-kernel mailing list
>
>Ros-kernel at reactos.com
>
>http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-kernel
>
>  
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster
http://search.yahoo.com