hardon at online.no
Sun Apr 10 04:35:34 CEST 2005
Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> Mike Nordell wrote:
>> Hartmut Birr wrote:
>> If not, it's simply impossible to get correct and intended functionality,
>> should preemtion occur.
Irql must obviously stay the same no matter if we were preempted and/or
taskswitched a trillion times. The case here is probably a bug in the
task switcher, where it "restores" the thread at a irql different from
what was current when it was "suspended", and after 11 hours(!) this bug
just happends to materialize in-between two related KeGetKurrentIrql
calls. It doesnt sound very likely, does it... Still, i cant think of
anything else that may cause this behaviour.
> I very much doubt the irql should change at all...
> Best Regards,
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.com
More information about the Ros-dev