ionucu at videotron.ca
Sun Apr 10 02:13:32 CEST 2005
James Tabor wrote:
> Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
>> Mike Nordell wrote:
>>> Hartmut Birr wrote:
>>> If not, it's simply impossible to get correct and intended
>>> should preemtion occur.
>> I very much doubt the irql should change at all...
>> Best Regards,
> It did not click in my pee brain, "Preemption"? How could it preempt
> kernel space? I thought atm that was imposable.
Yeah, we don't really preempt on UP as far as I know with the current
scheduler. I think this only happens on MP, and I agree that the IRQL
probably doesn't get restored properly. Hopefully it'll work fine in my
scheduler...I had a similar problem but I found the bug and fixed it.
More information about the Ros-dev