[ros-dev] RE: [ros-svn] [gdalsnes] 16793: my 1st

[Gedi]

Alex Ionescu wrote: 

>
> I think he is trying to fix them directly. The thing with win32k is 
> that if you fix A, BCD will break. You will fix B, only to see E and F 
> break, and attempting to fix E and C in the same time will make a 
> conflict, causing G not to function. G will have to be reimplemented 
> from scratch, and finally E and F will work again. However, to get C 
> going, H, I, J need to be rewritten. After doing so, your A fix does 
> not work anymore, because it depended on the old broken code. Fixing A 
> fixes the trick, but B has broken as well now, since it depended on A. 
> You finally manage to fix A and D, but your H, I, J rewrite causes K, 
> L and Z to be incompatible with the kernel. After yet another round of 
> rewriting their implementations, you notice that you've rewritten half 
> the thing and the two halves look like shit. You proceed in rewriting 
> M-X.


LMAO.
If you can read that without ending up with your head up your arse, you 
need help  ;)


Ged.