[ros-dev] Re: [ros-svn] [hbirr] 14000: Use only one access to the spinlock in the assertion, because the value may change between two access' on smp machines.

Thomas Weidenmueller w3seek at reactos.com
Sun Mar 13 11:45:13 CET 2005


hbirr at svn.reactos.com wrote:

>Use only one access to the spinlock in the assertion, because the value may change between two access' on smp machines.
>  
>
You implementation is better, no doubt, but it wouldn't have mattered to 
read it twice or more. I mean, it's re-read again down in the 
InterlockedExchange call, there's a possibility it might have been 
changed in the meantime as well. But it really wouldn't matter ;)

Best Regards,
Thomas


More information about the Ros-dev mailing list