[ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 14047: Dispatching & Queue Rewrite II:

[Richard Campbell]

I'm not sure, but i believe he is referring to the 'checked build' 
versions of windows nt...that is, versions of NT that included debugging 
symbols.

Hartmut Birr wrote:

>Alex Ionescu schrieb:
>
>  
>
>>Hartmut Birr wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>Alex Ionescu schrieb:
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>This introduces hacks into KeWaitXxx (remember != WrQueue?? :P) and
>>>>also, if you look inside a checked build of NT, you will find
>>>>ASSERT(Header->Type != QueueObject) inside KeWaitXxx so that really
>>>>made me unshare the code :)
>>>>
>>>>  
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Can you explain this a little bit more?
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>In order to share the code, Gunnar had to insert a hack into the wait
>>code not to do some things if the wait mode is WrQueue. By using a
>>dedicated function, the hack can be removed.
>>
>>    
>>
>Currently I'm not content with this     answer , I expect more an answer
>to 'if you look inside a checked build of NT'.
>
>- Hartmut
>_______________________________________________
>Ros-dev mailing list
>Ros-dev at reactos.com
>http://reactos.com:8080/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
>
>  
>