[ros-dev] Re: [ros-diffs] [ion] 14047: Dispatching & Queue Rewrite II:

Hartmut Birr hartmut.birr at gmx.de
Tue Mar 15 18:12:03 CET 2005


Hartmut Birr schrieb:

>Alex Ionescu schrieb:
>
>  
>
>>This introduces hacks into KeWaitXxx (remember != WrQueue?? :P) and
>>also, if you look inside a checked build of NT, you will find
>>ASSERT(Header->Type != QueueObject) inside KeWaitXxx so that really
>>made me unshare the code :)
>>
>>    
>>
>Can you explain this a little bit more?
>
Hi,

sometimes I find some pieces of code, with which isn't clearly for me,
from where does the knowledge come for the implementation. Such code
isn't used and it isn't necessary for the current status of ros. This is
only a statement and has nothing to do with the changes from revision
14047. If I see a discussion with an answer which does sound like 'look
inside windows and you will find some line of code...', sorry call me
paranoid, I must get this clarify. I am a little bit disappointed from
the following dialogue. Actually I've expected the following answer or
something like this:  'I wrote a test driver and it has hit an assertion
on Windows for queues'.

- Hartmut


More information about the Ros-dev mailing list