[ros-dev] svn://svn.reactos.org/trunk/windows

[Emanuele Aliberti]

Casper Hornstrup wrote:

>It would be advantageous to first have a discussion and then a vote.
>
>  
>
I support discussing it, since also further coding by me in 
reactos/subsys/csr depends on that choice.
My initial bare implementation of the CSR was different than the actual 
code by Alex Ionescu. He used NT 5.1 as a model. I tried to clean it, 
not cloning it.
Probably developers should, at the end of the discussion, vote about it, 
about keeping subsystem separate and support modules as neutral as 
possible, or cloning MS design. Making a top level trunk/windows and 
moving there the Win32 subsystem pieces, that now are under 
trunk/reactos, perhaps is a simple consequence.

>It makes sense that Win16 be separate too so why not call the module
>win32 instead?
>  
>
I'd avoid that, imho. The same should also apply for a 
trunk/reactos-i386 and a trunk/reactos-ppc...

-- 
:Emanuele Aliberti