ea at iol.it
Sun Oct 9 15:06:23 CEST 2005
Casper Hornstrup wrote:
>It would be advantageous to first have a discussion and then a vote.
I support discussing it, since also further coding by me in
reactos/subsys/csr depends on that choice.
My initial bare implementation of the CSR was different than the actual
code by Alex Ionescu. He used NT 5.1 as a model. I tried to clean it,
not cloning it.
Probably developers should, at the end of the discussion, vote about it,
about keeping subsystem separate and support modules as neutral as
possible, or cloning MS design. Making a top level trunk/windows and
moving there the Win32 subsystem pieces, that now are under
trunk/reactos, perhaps is a simple consequence.
>It makes sense that Win16 be separate too so why not call the module
I'd avoid that, imho. The same should also apply for a
trunk/reactos-i386 and a trunk/reactos-ppc...
More information about the Ros-dev