[ros-dev] ReactOS UI Team - Concept, Plan, and: help wanted
post.center at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 11:41:01 CEST 2005
Rick Langschultz schrieb:
> I think ReactOS would benefit from something like an xml interfacing
> scripting language to ReactOS. Something like applescript, but i was
> thinking integration with the Mono project could greatly increase the
> feasibility of this type of interface. The interfacing scripting
> language could be available in the C# language. Of course mcs would
> have to be integrated into some sort of system service. But first
> reactos needs to have system services and file system protection in
> place before this model fully works.
> On Oct 12, 2005, at 5:07 PM, Robert Köpferl wrote:
>> I think that's a bad idea.
>> There're too much XML describing a GUI projects out there. Why make
>> another 3?
>> We'd rather orient in this case on M$ and further work with RC-
>> files. Despite of their static sizing character. This (also xmlish)
>> avalon is ont thing i don't really like, but it's one think, i think
>> we have to implement. At least it will wipe away sizing problems.
>> But apps get heavier and file-ier and slower and xmlisher. All
>> Maritn "E.T." Misuth wrote:
>>> Rick Langschultz wrote:
>>>> Actually a utility or an explorer like integration with a
>>>> scripting language would be a great idea for reactos, however I
>>>> don't think it is
>>>> ready for such a feature yet.
>>> I was rather thinking about using XUL to define UI interfaces for
>>> almost every
>>> native ReactOS app from regedit to mmc equivalent. Maybe even
>>> translation could
>>> simplified this way ;)), just replug XML interface files with that
>>> of another
>>> language. Just my thoughts...
>>> Ros-dev mailing list
>>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
>> Ros-dev mailing list
>> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> Rick Langschultz
> rlangschultz at cox.net (Home)
> rlangschultz at ellemaespa.com (Work)
> rlangschultz at email.uophx.edu (School)
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
I think scripting like AppleScript is very important. And xml
interfacing like XUL is a nice feature, but we don't need it at the moment.
But the earlier we integrate something like that, the more resources we
save. Integrating XUL needs a lot of work, I think a lot of thing need
to be rewritten.
More information about the Ros-dev