[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [cfinck] 31298: Revert 31292, 31294 and 31297. Every change I try for fixing the build in one component breaks the build for another component. winebuild wasn't synchronized completely to the Wine version anyway, and the current Wine
aleksey at reactos.org
Tue Dec 18 12:03:04 CET 2007
I merged it, taking in account winebuild's changes (using output()
function for example), so in 31300 it seems to work correctly.
I didn't really understood that AJ's message - Wine does not need
stubs as stubbed functions at all, but rather want all of them to be
manually implemented in a standalone .c file as stubs? or?
On Dec 18, 2007, at 5:11 AM, Steven Edwards wrote:
> On Dec 17, 2007 6:36 PM, <cfinck at svn.reactos.org> wrote:
>> Every change I try for fixing the build in one component breaks
>> the build for another component.
>> winebuild wasn't synchronized completely to the Wine version
>> anyway, and the current Wine version removed support for the --
>> pedll option we use, so a full clean sync isn't possible.
> Can you merge the --pedll patch up to the trunk rather than reverting?
> You might want to comment out the stubs anyway or add real stubs and
> submit them to wine as per Alexandre's rejection of the patch by GvG
> Steven Edwards
> "There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
> that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
More information about the Ros-dev