[ros-dev] Audit

[Alex Ionescu]

I thought Rand and Nyaneave cleansed saidar of the taint?

--
Best regards,
Alex Ionescu

On 22-Sep-07, at 3:22 PM, Aleksey Bragin wrote:

>
> On Sep 22, 2007, at 10:19 PM, João Jerónimo wrote:
>
>> The point of a possible 3rd party audit is raising the legal
>> credibility of
>> the ReactOS project by ensuring that no tainted code is left in the
>> source
>> tree, right?
> The word "tainted" is actually quite wrong, and is being misused
> everywhere.
> A tea was tainted by polonium in a not-so-recent accident in the UK.
> ReactOS is not a tea, and we have no "polonium" commiters.
>
> There will be a WineConf event in 1 or 2 weeks, and they say they are
> going to clear up the legal situation around Wine, around SFLC audit
> and around requirements to the developers, whose code may be commited
> to the tree.
>
> When they do it, I would be very glad to know those requirements, and
> enforce them on ReactOS developers, so that we are on the common  
> ground.
>
>>
>> Well, if the project is going to wait until more modules stabilize,
>> won't
>> this stabilization process obfuscate most of the tainted source
>> code, and
>> make them hard to find?
>
> Your mind is ahead of you. "Taint obfuscated code", "Obfuscate
> tainted code", ...
> Your question is obfuscated and may be tainted, I won't answer it.
>
>
> WBR,
> Aleksey Bragin.
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev