[ros-dev] Audit

Magnus Olsen magnus at greatlord.com
Mon Sep 24 12:58:35 CEST 2007


It seam u fall into he SFLC traps they are trying push doing the audlt of
ros from a 3 part project
of ros, and we shall obay theirs rules it mean all api that is not document
in msdn shall be remove
and so on. That mean 80% of ntoskrnl will go away, for around 80% of
ntoskrnl are not in msdn
80% of win32k will go aways, for thuse api are not in msdn, then shall we
not talk about audio
no audio system and so on.

that mean no ros, if we play after SLFC and we need also write papper give
up our copyright to
them. no thanks


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Daniel Reimer" <reimer.daniel at freenet.de>
To: "ReactOS Development List" <ros-dev at reactos.org>
Sent: Monday, September 24, 2007 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: [ros-dev] Audit


> James Tabor schrieb:
> > Hi!
> > Ged wrote:
> >
> >> Aleksey Bragin wrote:
> >>
> >>> Well-well, please calm down, we had enough flamewars, a new one is
> >>> not necessary.
> >>>
> >> I'm sure James knows it's not my intention to start a flamewar :)
> >>
> >> Alex Ionescu wrote:
> >>
> >>> Now you may not agree with that view, but that's James' view.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> It's not whether I agree with that view, that person, that project,
that
> >> foundation or whatever.
> >> I just disagree with constantly publically slagging off another
project,
> >> especially one which we rely heavily on.
> >>
> >> Ged.
> >>
> >>
> > I'm trying to warn everyone.
> > James
> > _______________________________________________
> > Ros-dev mailing list
> > Ros-dev at reactos.org
> > http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev
> >
> >
> >
> I think a 3rd Party Audit shows only one thing (or better two things) I
> think the members of this project know the Source best and will see all
> Code which could be "dangerous", like strange Inline Assembler or Magic
> Numbers. A 3rd Party Audit shows that they need help to even understand
> the Code because they never wrote/understand it and it was just copy
> pasted it from somewhere. There might be the argument that letting some
> ppl from outside of the project do the Audit may be more trustful. But I
> trust the devs and you all should do, too! If some dickheads that are
> not even members of this Project try to give us the order to do
> somethhing we should not even listen to them.
>
> /me walks to the side where Jim and Magnus are standing.
>
> Daniel "EmuandCo" Reimer
> _______________________________________________
> Ros-dev mailing list
> Ros-dev at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-dev



More information about the Ros-dev mailing list