[ros-dev] Audit

[Aleksey Bragin]

Please stop rumouring this topic. I clearly said "if there are strong  
circumstances, in future, only then we will think about doing 3rd  
party audit, and only from agreement of all devs". That's 3 or 4  
years away from now, if such legal problems ever happen.

Also noone ever said SFLC is taking up copyrights to themselves. At  
least it's first time I hear this.
I just grepped Wine source code base for word "SFLC" - doesn't appear  
anywhere. Also, open up any of Wine's source code file, you'll see  
"Copyright 200x Person's Name".

And again, I didn't suggest SFLC or FSF or whoever. Time will show  
who and if we need, and who and if agrees to.


WBR,
Aleksey Bragin.


On Sep 24, 2007, at 2:58 PM, Magnus Olsen wrote:

> It seam u fall into he SFLC traps they are trying push doing the  
> audlt of
> ros from a 3 part project
> of ros, and we shall obay theirs rules it mean all api that is not  
> document
> in msdn shall be remove
> and so on. That mean 80% of ntoskrnl will go away, for around 80% of
> ntoskrnl are not in msdn
> 80% of win32k will go aways, for thuse api are not in msdn, then  
> shall we
> not talk about audio
> no audio system and so on.
>
> that mean no ros, if we play after SLFC and we need also write  
> papper give
> up our copyright to
> them. no thanks