winehacker at gmail.com
Mon Sep 24 22:02:54 CEST 2007
On 9/24/07, Magnus Olsen <magnus at greatlord.com> wrote:
> It seam u fall into he SFLC traps they are trying push doing the audlt of
> ros from a 3 part project
> of ros, and we shall obay theirs rules it mean all api that is not document
> in msdn shall be remove
> and so on. That mean 80% of ntoskrnl will go away, for around 80% of
> ntoskrnl are not in msdn
> 80% of win32k will go aways, for thuse api are not in msdn, then shall we
> not talk about audio
> no audio system and so on.
I am so sick of the lies you are spewing. No one (except Mingw-w32api)
has ever said only use stuff only from MSDN. They have said show us an
application that uses this api, explain how you documented it, one of
those sources of documentation can be MSDN, if its not MSDN explain
how you came to figure out the prototype either via test case or
reversing the third party application using the implementation. NOT
REVERSING the implementation itself and then reimplementing it.
If your going to run your mouth and attack the SFLC and the Wine
project, at least do it with a credible argument like I have done.
DO NOT RESTORE TO LIES and DISTORTIONS of fact. It just makes your
case look weaker.
"There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world, and
that is an idea whose time has come." - Victor Hugo
More information about the Ros-dev