[ros-dev] [ros-diffs] [dgorbachev] 39422: Fix bug #4129 in CmpGetNameControlBlock().
d.g.gorbachev at gmail.com
Tue Feb 17 02:34:49 CET 2009
> I personally feel consistent application of the style is also important,
> and that there does not exist a reason to deviate from the established
> coding style in this situation.
I agree that it is good to follow the consistent coding style. The question
is this style itself is good.
I meant the abstract case of ((a = b) && (c = d)), not the concrete case of
((ConvKey == HashEntry->ConvKey) && (Length == Ncb->NameLength)).
More information about the Ros-dev