[ros-general] Wait a second...

[jwalsh at bigpond.net.au]

Since this is still [ros-general], emphasis on "general":

When I first saw your ros home page I was very impressed with the amount of effort which must have gone into it. There were some errors but tolerable.
Some of the loose references to ros being "buggy" is not helpfull either.
Preserving the Windows "buggyness" is a little too extreme.
I imagined that a lot of money must have secured ros the top system designers.
Amazing that it has all been done on "the smell of and oil rag".
Congratulations !.
I also thought that focussing on some obvious (to us) mistakes would be "nit picking".
However it is now becoming a serious issue, which I feel can be addressed by a few simple "adjustments". Perhaps I'm overreacting.
But, falling back on regulation is throwing good energy after bad.
I don't see that it is necessary.
Is it appropriate to discuss it here?
As for this:
> > Just code, don't talk works fine...when you are a two people project.
I would suggest they retire to minGW-Msys where they can talk code "until the cows come home" and be gently diciplined by Earnie Boyd, its a great list.
Then maybe  [ros-general] can stay as it is "general".


Regards and rosuccess
Justin
Justin

---- K McI <uniq at wwsvr.bounceme.net> wrote: 
> Casper Hornstrup wrote:
> > Just code, don't talk works fine...when you are a two people project.
> 
> I agree exactly. Governments have constitutions to prevent seizures of 
> or misallocation of power, or worse, total inaction do to fear of those 
> things. Projects have them to prevent infighting (As I recently noticed 
> on another, different project) and the above.
> 
> Also, that rule applies best when there are few, well known and trusted 
> people in a project and little major outside knowledge or information 
> because it assumes everyone is trustworthy and there's no inclination to 
> duplicity or malice.
> 
> The new site seems to have elevated ROS a new level, most especially now 
> that BugZilla is usable, things are definitely moving faster. IMAO, I 
> suggest this be done (However), if for nothing else then to hopefully 
> preclude the recent vote-fights I've been seeing on the ML.
> 
> Thanx,
> 
>          -uQ
> _______________________________________________
> ros-general mailing list
> ros-general at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general