Issue 3. [Re: [ros-general] ROS-User-Issues]

[jwalsh at bigpond.net.au]

---- Lyrical Nanoha <LyricalNanoha at dosius.net> wrote: 
> On Thu, 27 Oct 2005, Murphy, Ged (Bolton) wrote:
> 
> > 9x is dead. It's not coming back, and I can't think of anyone besides
> > yourself who would want it back.
> > It's a terrible, terrible operating system which is better left dead and
> > buried.
> 
> I know a handful of people who hate the NT-based systems and want their 98 
> back (or refuse to upgrade past 98 even to 2000 which is a far superior 
> system).  They want their legacy support.
> 
> Granted, if I could do it I would simply because I'm prolly the only one 
> with a snowball's chance in hell of being able to pull it off, who 
> actually gives a damn about the 9x series anymore, lol.
> 
Let's wait and see shall we.
cheers and rosuccess
Justin
> -uso.
> _______________________________________________
> ros-general mailing list
> ros-general at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general