[ros-kernel] 0.2.2 RC2

[Royce Mitchell III]

I agree, this sounds like too big a change since we're in code freeze 
already. Even if we merged stuff that's directly copied from wine, they 
may change some functionality we might currently be relying on. While 
that scenario would be a change for the better, it's not something we 
want to end up in the middle of while trying to get the release out. 
Even though it sounds like an innocuous change, it could cause problems 
( especially since we wouldn't be merging all the changes ).

These merges should be in HEAD and appear in 0.2.3, methinks.

Andrew Greenwood wrote:

> I think we should keep things as they are already and only merge 
> changes after the release.
>  
> We're about half a month overdue anyway...
>  
>
>     ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* Stephen Hodges <mailto:theteofscuba at hotmail.com>
>     *To:* ReactOS Kernel List <mailto:ros-kernel at reactos.com>
>     *Sent:* Sunday, April 25, 2004 11:35 PM
>     *Subject:* [ros-kernel] 0.2.2 RC2
>
>     Since a release is pending soon, and WINE has since made a new
>     release on Apr 8, I'd like to synchronize any components that do
>     not require heavy modification for testing. Does anybody have a
>     list of which parts of ROS are directly copied from the wine
>     source -without- modifications?
>
>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>     _______________________________________________
>     Ros-kernel mailing list
>     Ros-kernel at reactos.com
>     http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-kernel
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ros-kernel mailing list
>Ros-kernel at reactos.com
>http://reactos.com/mailman/listinfo/ros-kernel
>


-- 
-------------------------
http://wecanstopspam.org/