[ros-kernel] Differences between ntdll and ntoskrnl Rtl functions

[Gunnar Dalsnes]

> >That's why the runtime libaries use to implement a single 
> function per 
> >source file.
> 
> and why this principle can't be applied to the Rtl escapes me
> 

It seems like that is the only way, but even if doing this it won't save
much. It will maybe avoid 10 unused rtl routines from being included, and
compared to the rest of ntdll/ntoskrnl api's that's not much.

If the build system is fixed, having rtl built when building ntdll/ntoskrnl,
i can't think of any problems with having a shared rtl.

-Gunnar