What's your source for that? ReactOS has always been an attempt at an operating system compatible with applications and drivers. There has never been an attempt to have the same inner workings. For that, you'd need to clone the original source code, and extensive effort has gone into ensuring that ...

ReactOS is in the same way a clone as Libre Office is. Compatibility to a format. Same behavior to the world outside. Totally different inside. Which is not the case of ROS which tries (as far as I know) to follow the Windows design as close as possible. Not only being compatible with the "res...

ReactOS is an implementation of the NT architecture with a Win32 subsystem. So technically, no, we're not a clone. As Samba is an implementation of CIFS. Trying to reproduce the exact same behaviour of Windows sounds cloning to me more than support for a file format like (any) MS Office alternative...

EmuandCo wrote:And no, I dont care to run any clones for anything if I own the original.

No offense, but to create a clone is not the point of ROS?

As the title said, it is possible to watch somewhere the video or/and to have slides of the recent Ionescu's talk about ROS in Montreal? Thanks!

It's weird (imo) that people here are so concerned with "details" when the entire thing is barely usable.

Non per dire (magari ho capito male) ma cosa se ne fa uno di una "distribuzione" Cygwin quando può usare
tranquillamente Linux/*BSD?

The other way around would be interesting. As a pure X11 Window Manager maybe too chatty and slow with too many roundtrips (not to mention supporting all the requirements). But directly on top of KMS/DRM would be really fast and light (as a kernel module like in Windows). QT and GTK already happily ...