Of course I can test it myself, it was just that he tested a Java arcade emulator, so I insisted that he should test a Java NES one as well.

I'm pretty sure you're wrong though - how else could one explain the "I don't have it" statement?

gabrielilardi wrote:

Nintendo Maniac 64 wrote: I DEMAND you to try out Nintendo8!

I don't have it, but you're free to do some testing and report back

You obviously don't know what Nintendo8 is then

May I recommend Google?

gabrielilardi wrote:Updated screenshots; Firefox 2.0.0.20 running Java running an arcade emulator

I DEMAND you to try out Nintendo8!

EmuandCo wrote:Debug is for Developers and outputs important Information over the COM Port, but its more stable than the Release one which does not.

I was told in IRC that debug versions were less stable than release versions...

A video showing someone using Ros for a certain app over a certain time on certain hardware won't show you the numerous hardware issues, potential crashes, user interface rough edges and stuff. Consider that they might be pretty lucky to have found a hardware/software combination that works. I for ...

Shouldn't we be putting screenshots in this topic, or is that only for official ReactOS releases?

Basically, the current Win32 in ReactOS is kinda bad. Until it gets to a good quality state, we'll be borrowing WINE's Win32, AKA ARWINSS.

That's a circulus vitiosus, something is not much used because it is not popular, and not popular because not much used. To break the circle, it should be used despite its unpopularity… But the issue is that ReactOS is already unpopular. If ReactOS was popular, we'd be able to drive traffic to the ...

Even then, it would still take time. Time is they key here - with Arwinss the devs are trying to jump-start ReactOS's ability to, well, WORK.

Lawl XD

Well, USB was just one example. The point was working on other things in general.

But if less work has to be put into win32 (that'll be mostly done by the WINE folk), then more ReactOS developers can concentrate on other things, such as USB.

Also, wouldn't Arwinss allow devs to get more work done elsewhere? So it could lead to better compatibility that way as well.

So for all intended purposes, ARWINSS is pretty much intended to be a stop-gap?

ZSNES much?