(L)GPL?

Here you can discuss ReactOS related topics.

Moderator: Moderator Team

Post Reply
uniQ
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:58 am

(L)GPL?

Post by uniQ » Sun Dec 12, 2004 12:04 pm

ROS is GPL, but when making contributions, everyone seems to say that LGPL is better for the individual contributions. Why (is) this?

-uniQ
Coming on, coming up, let me help ROS and I'll be able to look @ a life well used.

Gasmann
Posts: 283
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 6:53 pm
Location: Germany
Contact:

Re: (L)GPL?

Post by Gasmann » Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:50 pm

uniQ wrote:ROS is GPL, but when making contributions, everyone seems to say that LGPL is better for the individual contributions. Why (is) this?

-uniQ
As far as I understand the LGPL only makes it possible to use the project in commercial software, but maybe I'm wrong.

SirTalon
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 8:53 pm

Post by SirTalon » Sun Dec 12, 2004 7:53 pm

LGPLs main difference from GPL is that non open source (non GPL/LGPL/etc), can not link against it (like it can't be used as a library).

e7
Posts: 92
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 8:32 pm
Location: In Bayern ganz oben

Post by e7 » Sun Dec 12, 2004 8:43 pm

A DLL, licensed under the terms of LGPL can be used by other programs like MSOffice. If the DLL is licensed under GPL and MSOffice use it, MSOffice must be GPL too.

Or you can say if you would say it extremly: If you write a GPL-Macro in MSOffice, MSOffice must be GPL ;)

uniQ
Posts: 246
Joined: Sat Dec 04, 2004 8:58 am

Post by uniQ » Mon Dec 13, 2004 2:39 am

But why is licensing contributions as LGPL preferred when ROS is GPL to begin with?

-uniQ
Coming on, coming up, let me help ROS and I'll be able to look @ a life well used.

sedwards
Developer
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2004 11:33 pm
Contact:

LGPL

Post by sedwards » Mon Dec 13, 2004 7:24 am

It needs to be LGPL so we can share code with Wine. 3rd party software can be licensed anyway it wants as it does not use our SDK/DDK to build. Even if they did our SDK and DDK is public domain so the only time someone must GPL or LGPL the application is if they directly use our source code in that application.
-sedwards

Epmak
Posts: 15
Joined: Thu Dec 02, 2004 1:37 pm

Post by Epmak » Mon Dec 13, 2004 10:51 am

uniQ wrote:But why is licensing contributions as LGPL preferred when ROS is GPL to begin with?
Not sure but why just not contribute code related to wine under 2 licenses:
GPL & LGPL

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DotBot [Crawler] and 1 guest