nopeEmuandCo wrote:Oh, you tried Clover... did it work?
Blog: Spilling the Wine
Moderator: Moderator Team
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
Yes, that's rightgigaherz wrote:I believe that screenshot was cropped, since it's properly aligned to the bottom of the screen for me. If that's not the case, I'll need more info to replicate the issue.
screenshot updated
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
"Server not found."gigaherz wrote:Hello, to anyone interested, here are a new set of builds from the branch, right after yesterday's trunk sync (r63640).
You can choose between Remember that VS builds need WinDbg attached to the serial port in order to start the installer (not required afterwards).
[EDIT: Replaced links with reactos-hosted files.]
- EmuandCo
- Developer
- Posts: 4731
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location: Germany, Bavaria, Steinfeld
- Contact:
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
WORKSFORME
ReactOS is still in alpha stage, meaning it is not feature-complete and is recommended only for evaluation and testing purposes.
If my post/reply offends or insults you, be sure that you know what sarcasm is...
If my post/reply offends or insults you, be sure that you know what sarcasm is...
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
Christoph thinks it's a DNS issue, since other iserv subdomains do work.
Here are the old MEGA.co.nz links while they fix the issue:
Here are the old MEGA.co.nz links while they fix the issue:
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
I think the only appropriate thing to do is start a free leak finding alternative!
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
If you have the knowledge to write something like that, we'd all welcome it. That's way outside my area of expertise... ;P
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
What about Visual Leak Detector? It seems to be free. But I know nothing of these programs either.
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
Sadly, that program only detects MEMORY leaks, and the ones I am currently worried about are MENU HANDLE leaks, which only a very few programs can find.milon wrote:What about Visual Leak Detector? It seems to be free. But I know nothing of these programs either.
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:13 pm
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
I reserve the right to ignore any portion of any post if I deem it not constructive or likely to cause the discussion to degenerate.
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
Sadly, no ;Pjustincase wrote: Perhaps this may be helpful: http://blogs.msdn.com/b/junfeng/archive ... -leak.aspx
Maybe?
That's Kernel handles, as in, the ones exposed by kernel32.dll
The ones I need to fix are USER handles, exposed by user32.dll
There's also GDI handles, exposed by gdi32.dll but those are also not the ones I care about at the moment ;P
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:13 pm
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
What about this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... s.85).aspx
I reserve the right to ignore any portion of any post if I deem it not constructive or likely to cause the discussion to degenerate.
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
Uhm, the title clearly says "memory leaks" ;Pjustincase wrote:What about this http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library ... s.85).aspx
Sorry, I did spend some hours looking, so I have probably seen all the best options already. If you want to surprise me, you'd have to find something that can trace user handles, specifically menu handles.
-
- Posts: 441
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:13 pm
Re: Blog: Spilling the Wine
Technically what it's referring to as "memory leaks" are "resource leaks", which could be a number of things, possibly including the kind of user handle leaks you're trying to plug. And if you actually read the page, it describes how to use UMDH (User Mode Dump Heap) to create a user mode stack trace database, make log files from the heap memory allocations for the process, and compare them to find out what should vs shouldn't be in the heap, and which function each leak occurred in.gigaherz wrote:Uhm, the title clearly says "memory leaks" ;P
Having not tried it I don't know for certain that it'll work for what you're looking at, but it sounds to me like it might do it, so I'd appreciate it if you didn't simply pass it off because the person who wrote the title decided to use a term which you assumed was meant specifically, where it could also be used as a general term.
(after all it is in fact leaking memory, even if memory is not all it's leaking, and the reason for the leak is due to unclosed user handles, rather than unnecessary (or no-longer-necessary) memory allocations)
I reserve the right to ignore any portion of any post if I deem it not constructive or likely to cause the discussion to degenerate.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Ahrefs [Bot] and 65 guests