If it behaves the same, switching from one to another should be seamless. Having to read documentation for new features is part of a learning curve, when the target is to minimize this, at least for the official project. Again, distributions can revolve around adding extra features. These distributions could even be part of official ReactOS (think about flavors as in Ubuntu, some derivatives were official spins sponsored by Canonical, and even some of them aren't sponsored anymore, they are still allowed to use the trademark, so they are part of the "official" ecosystem), although in different packages.erkinalp wrote:It is impossible to have zero learning curve transistion between two different (albeit similar) things. However, extra features will get the same documentation as regular ones(meaning they will be documented in detail) so the learning curve will remain almost straight and be very short. Ones having a hard time would seek for ReactOS Product Keymrugiero wrote:For the rest of the post, although I do like the idea, I think that belongs to the distributions. "Official" ReactOS should, IMO, be minimal and be closely compatible in all of usability. Added features, ... a learning curve they do not want, and customizability means variability they don't want, as it's easier to troubleshoot a strict setup, and it's easier to do that the default and then let the distributors who want something different to add the extra features than to expect the other one to remove them.
System utilities on ROS
Moderator: Moderator Team
Re: System utilities on ROS
Re: System utilities on ROS
It does still need a more detailed documentation.Windows is poorly documented in user manuals side.Having to read documentation for new features is part of a learning curve, when the target is to minimize this, at least for the official project
-uses Ubuntu+GNOME 3 GNU/Linux
-likes Free (as in freedom) and Open Source Detergents
-favors open source of Windows 10 under GPL2
-likes Free (as in freedom) and Open Source Detergents
-favors open source of Windows 10 under GPL2
Re: System utilities on ROS
Maybe, but the point is that people are already used to Windows.erkinalp wrote:It does still need a more detailed documentation.Windows is poorly documented in user manuals side.Having to read documentation for new features is part of a learning curve, when the target is to minimize this, at least for the official project
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests