Back to Website

Re: Future Start Menu

The place to bring up any design issues, or post your own creations

Moderator: Moderator Team

Re: Future Start Menu

Postby Hamguy » Fri Jun 17, 2016 8:33 am

naums wrote:Lets keep it plain and simple for once. Give me the Win2K Start menu. Just one bar and stuff and I'm happy. Or at least give me the option to get the old one back :)


I think it should be win7 start menu but have an option to use classic start menu and also allow multiple themes. win2k is outdated and wouldn't appeal to people looking to switch.
Hamguy
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 1:22 am

Re: Future Start Menu

Postby Reziac » Thu Feb 16, 2017 6:19 am

My two cents: Win7's start menu is one of the reasons I went back to XP. The other is how they messed up Windows Explorer. (No, Classic Shell doesn't really fix either.) When the world is already full of Win7-8-10 type menus, another just like 'em isn't special. But for those who prefer XP's way of doing things... we have fewer and fewer options, and an XP clone is attractive, while a Win7 clone is not.
Reziac
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 7:35 am

Re: Future Start Menu

Postby dizt3mp3r » Thu Feb 16, 2017 1:50 pm

Not important at this stage - the devs are not really interested so much in the idea of an alternative look and feel for ReactOS, getting it to function at all in order to equate some of the functionality found in W2003 is the aim at the moment.
dizt3mp3r
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:54 pm

Re: Future Start Menu

Postby Reziac » Fri Feb 17, 2017 5:24 am

Good by me. I imagine if someone really wants it, they can write an alternative shell/theme thingee, sort of ClassicShell in reverse.
Reziac
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2016 7:35 am

Re: Future Start Menu

Postby Blackcrack » Fri Mar 31, 2017 8:25 am

Hi,

1. Not important at this stage, like dizt3mp3r told.

2, why not diffrent dll's who make the Starmenu for use different, switchable,
from Win95 up to for Win10 for win10 lovers..

i guess this want be a option.. or, easy build as a switchable dll
(menu.dll, menuwin95.dll, menu98.dll, menume.dll,menunt4.dll)
and so on.. this dll can maybe have enhanced options via
configurationdialog.. so also the taskbaar, systray and so on..
if this maybe any programming for reactos, an surface with plugins like
lightstep, but with configurations-dialog up to snapins and enhancements.

This is now with Reactos possible, because, the code it is open source and all
can be overviewed with this it is also possible for programming an surface where it is all possible.

Also a Steampunktheme, who it is to the last corner through designed.
with maybe a spezially Desktop Shell with plugins and snapins.
(in 3D/4K 8-) )

KDE (4) for windows was maybe an bit really too early there,
but they should programming now further, because, today it is now kde for windows
testable and working, because... QT works now so far well => Epic win -> QTweb.exe portable like i guess ..

best regards
Blacky
Blackcrack
 
Posts: 1722
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:55 pm

Re: Future Start Menu

Postby ChaosCloud » Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:24 pm

Reziac wrote:My two cents: Win7's start menu is one of the reasons I went back to XP. The other is how they messed up Windows Explorer. (No, Classic Shell doesn't really fix either.) When the world is already full of Win7-8-10 type menus, another just like 'em isn't special. But for those who prefer XP's way of doing things... we have fewer and fewer options, and an XP clone is attractive, while a Win7 clone is not.

Agreed. Win7 start menu is awful. I usually end up just typing things to find them, which kinda defeats the purpose of having a menu.
XP style cleans up nicely once the programs are organized - I create groups as follows: applications, games, hardware, maintenance, online.
ChaosCloud
 
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Apr 15, 2017 5:06 pm

Re: Future Start Menu

Postby middings » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:03 am

ChaosCloud wrote:Win7 start menu is awful. I usually end up just typing things to find them, which kinda defeats the purpose of having a menu.

IIRC, Microsoft's usability labs found that many (most?) people have trouble finding things in menu trees unless they are already very familiar with the menu tree. Many people dump their files in one big pile, then forget the name of the file. So, much of the time many people use Search to find things instead of hunting through menus and folders. Microsoft Windows 7 takes advantage of its improved Search and indexing features to facilitate "just typing things to find them". The menu is secondary.

XP style cleans up nicely once the programs are organized - I create groups as follows: applications, games, hardware, maintenance, online.

I organize the programs on my computer in a similar way. Windows 7 offers a larger number of built-in groups in which to place programs and files in the menu tree. Programs that use the Microsoft Windows 7 logo are expected to use them appropriately. A drawback of Microsoft Windows XP is that so many programs and files are grouped differently on each person's computer.
middings
 
Posts: 562
Joined: Tue May 07, 2013 9:18 pm
Location: California, USA


Return to Design

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests