Ask your support questions in here
Moderator: Moderator Team
Tiansen
Posts: 39 Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:56 pm
Post
by Tiansen » Mon Mar 12, 2007 10:11 pm
Congratulations for release!
Just for info: On AMD K6-2 500 MHz FreeLoader fails with Invalid Opcode.
0.3.0 boots fine on the same computer.
PeterK
Posts: 168 Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:24 am
Post
by PeterK » Mon Mar 12, 2007 11:52 pm
Tiansen wrote: On AMD K6-2 500 MHz FreeLoader fails with Invalid Opcode.
0.3.0 boots fine on the same computer.
There are known problems with AMD processors => invalid opcode
Tiansen
Posts: 39 Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:56 pm
Post
by Tiansen » Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:51 am
OK, I thought it was known only for Athlon XP.
Is this due to same Intel-only optimizations? Is it not written in some generic i386 code?
PeterK
Posts: 168 Joined: Mon Aug 07, 2006 9:24 am
Post
by PeterK » Wed Mar 14, 2007 12:45 pm
Tiansen wrote: OK, I thought it was known only for Athlon XP.
Is this due to same Intel-only optimizations? Is it not written in some generic i386 code?
Tiansen wrote: On AMD K6-2 500 MHz FreeLoader fails with Invalid Opcode.
I also have a INVALID OPCODE on a Pentium MMX 200.
See the attachement in
http://www.reactos.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2078
=> Comment #3 From PeterK
hto
Developer
Posts: 2193 Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:43 pm
Post
by hto » Wed Mar 14, 2007 4:12 pm
Is this due to same Intel-only optimizations?
Not necessary. There was such a problem due to buffer overflow.
Tiansen
Posts: 39 Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 1:56 pm
Post
by Tiansen » Wed Mar 14, 2007 11:11 pm
You said "was". I think you mean there was another such problem due to buffer overflow. My problem is still present in the trunk too, right?
hto
Developer
Posts: 2193 Joined: Sun Oct 01, 2006 3:43 pm
Post
by hto » Thu Mar 15, 2007 1:13 am
I think you mean there was another such problem due to buffer overflow.
Yes.
My problem is still present in the trunk too, right?
I don't know. Test it, if you like.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests