Is the audit over?
Moderator: Moderator Team
Is the audit over?
I saw on the homepage that the audit bar is at 100%. Is it for real, or an error?
What is your reason for trying to damage the ReactOS project? I really don't understand why someone who says they've devoted their life to ReactOS is so intent of damaging it's reputation.
We've said this before and we'll say it again:
"THOSE FILES ARE FROM THE SANOS PROJECT!!!"
We don't have the resources to check every single line of code we take from other projects. It's their responsibility to care for the code they release, not ours!
Please explain why you choose to attack us instead of sanos?
What do you hope to achieve with your constant attempts to damage ReactOS?
We've said this before and we'll say it again:
"THOSE FILES ARE FROM THE SANOS PROJECT!!!"
We don't have the resources to check every single line of code we take from other projects. It's their responsibility to care for the code they release, not ours!
Please explain why you choose to attack us instead of sanos?
What do you hope to achieve with your constant attempts to damage ReactOS?
Last edited by Ged on Thu Aug 02, 2007 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- EmuandCo
- Developer
- Posts: 4723
- Joined: Sun Nov 28, 2004 7:52 pm
- Location: Germany, Bavaria, Steinfeld
- Contact:
Betov: LAST WARNING. I'm starting to get sick of you, next time it will be your last post in here!
ReactOS is still in alpha stage, meaning it is not feature-complete and is recommended only for evaluation and testing purposes.
If my post/reply offends or insults you, be sure that you know what sarcasm is...
If my post/reply offends or insults you, be sure that you know what sarcasm is...
-
- Posts: 107
- Joined: Fri Sep 08, 2006 2:56 pm
I remember once i got called in for plagiarizing code in University, a simple stupid method in Java.
System.out.println("Enter your Interger Here : ") ;
int x = Readln ( );
(Readln was my own buffer reader extender).
Now, my so called "lecturer" accused me of plagiarizing because some other numbnuts decided to call his methods Read and Writeln 2.
Said numbnuts had the exact same lines of code as me, but the "lecturer" marked this dudes first, i had to rewrite this friggin Method (Three Minutes it took me wow) and then the stupid "lecturer" believed me, (but ironically the other guy then got called in for plagiarism). Said dude also rewrote method in a couple of minutes. No plagiarism at all. And guess what myself and the other dude wrote it the same again, just changed the method name.
Suffice it to say i never attended "class" again, still passed with 90% ^_^
What does this have to do with this issue at hand?
Absolutely nothing!
This just reminded me of that somehow.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Semrush [Bot] and 4 guests