Difference between revisions of "Talk:Driver Signing"
Wordmonger (talk | contribs) (Is Process Hacker compliant?) |
Colin Finck (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
I just don't get it. | I just don't get it. | ||
| + | :The complete feature list says: ''(32-bit only) Bypass almost all forms of process protection''. As the foundation only signs the 64-bit version, this feature is not included. (Disclaimer: I'm not involved in this Driver Signing initiative) - [[User:Colin Finck|Colin Finck]] 12:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 12:19, 11 March 2011
- This offer is contingent on fulfilling the following conditions: The driver may not be used to circumvent security features in the OS.
- Key features of Process Hacker: Powerful process termination that bypasses security software.
- Projects signed by the ReactOS Foundation: Process Hacker
I just don't get it.
- The complete feature list says: (32-bit only) Bypass almost all forms of process protection. As the foundation only signs the 64-bit version, this feature is not included. (Disclaimer: I'm not involved in this Driver Signing initiative) - Colin Finck 12:19, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
