Difference between revisions of "Talk:Internet Explorer"
Jedi-to-be (talk | contribs) |
m (→It's a waste of time) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I think ^-) | I think ^-) | ||
− | More | + | More browsers in downloader + more powerful downloader = the path |
- [[User:Jedi-to-be|Jedi-to-be]] | - [[User:Jedi-to-be|Jedi-to-be]] | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
the goal is to make a NT-compatible OS, not another independent and free OS - [[User:elhoir|elhoir]] | the goal is to make a NT-compatible OS, not another independent and free OS - [[User:elhoir|elhoir]] | ||
− | But for a now - there are more | + | But for a now - there are more important things for devs. May be we should make wine Gecko work? |
- [[User:Jedi-to-be|Jedi-to-be]] | - [[User:Jedi-to-be|Jedi-to-be]] |
Revision as of 20:50, 23 April 2009
You should ask one of the devs how this is meant to be written. At the moment your design is wrong.
Why not bundle Firefox ?
- d0g
It's a waste of time
I think ^-) More browsers in downloader + more powerful downloader = the path - Jedi-to-be
the goal is to make a NT-compatible OS, not another independent and free OS - elhoir
But for a now - there are more important things for devs. May be we should make wine Gecko work? - Jedi-to-be