Difference between revisions of "Talk:Internet Explorer"
Jedi-to-be (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I think ^-) | I think ^-) | ||
| + | More brousers in downloader + more powerful downloader = the path | ||
| + | - [[User:Jedi-to-be|Jedi-to-be]] | ||
| − | |||
the goal is to make a NT-compatible OS, not another independent and free OS - [[User:elhoir|elhoir]] | the goal is to make a NT-compatible OS, not another independent and free OS - [[User:elhoir|elhoir]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | But for a now - there are more impotant things for devs. May be we should make wine Gecko to work? | ||
| + | - [[User:Jedi-to-be|Jedi-to-be]] | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 23 April 2009
You should ask one of the devs how this is meant to be written. At the moment your design is wrong.
Why not bundle Firefox ?
- d0g
It's a waste of time
I think ^-) More brousers in downloader + more powerful downloader = the path - Jedi-to-be
the goal is to make a NT-compatible OS, not another independent and free OS - elhoir
But for a now - there are more impotant things for devs. May be we should make wine Gecko to work? - Jedi-to-be
