UAPI [Re: [ros-general] ReactOS UI...]

[jwalsh at bigpond.net.au]

OK Richard, Now I understand ( I think).
I have a choice to start that "other project" or find it.
Well for the benefit of the listeners I have started it.
In the interests of [ros-general] please consider UAPI closed.
Any private suggestions are welcome.
Thanks and rosSuccess.
Justin

---- Richard Campbell <eek2121 at comcast.net> wrote: 
> Last i checked, the ROS design isn't designed to correct anything.  It 
> is designed to be a drop in replacement for Windows NT, 2000, XP that is 
> compatible with applicatons and drivers.  It is then up to other 
> projects to mod that as they see fit.
> 
> Richard
> 
> Thomas Weidenmueller wrote:
> 
> >jwalsh at bigpond.net.au wrote:
> >  
> >
> >>The Original Windows is having anormous problems fighting off Virus and Malware.
> >>It is known that it's vunerability is builtin to its original design i.e. the TSR.
> >>Where does the ROS current design correct that inherent problem?
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >If we can't run viruses designed for windows (except those exploiting
> >bugs), the level of compatibility is rather low...
> >
> >  
> >
> >>If ROS is short staffed now how bad is it going to get, if and when things do take off.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >We're not going to have an OS that I would consider stable in the near
> >future. There are bugs and flaws everywhere you look, kind of the same
> >problem that wine has.
> >
> >  
> >
> >>If a multi billion dollar enterprise cannot stop it how can ROS stop it?
> >>This is not a trivial question.
> >>    
> >>
> >
> >Money can't fix everything, sometimes better decisions would help.
> >
> >- Thomas
> >_______________________________________________
> >ros-general mailing list
> >ros-general at reactos.org
> >http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ros-general mailing list
> ros-general at reactos.org
> http://www.reactos.org/mailman/listinfo/ros-general